Balkert

Tak for spamindlæg på bloggen :D

For det første er det nemt at afgøre at det er spam, så det skader ikke - Det er nemt og fjerne og det ender i spamkassen.

For det andet og det er langt vigtigere, fik det mig til at huske denne blog og lægge flere indlæg på.

Hvorfor man har lyst til at spamme et indlæg der må betragtes som ren folkeoplysning på en demokratisk blog, i et såkaldt demokratisk land det kan undre, er man virkelig så langt ude at man ikke kan svare kvalificeret og må ty til spam frem for debat? Så er det i den grad Sølle!!!

Tilføj kommentar 11. august 2009

GMO L-tryptophan triggered a deadly disease.

Dem der kan læse engelsk kan jo så hygge sig lidt med denne artikel:

Looking Back at Genetic Engineering’s First Deadly Disaster: L-tryptophan
Spilling the Beans, August 2005

“A Deadly Epidemic and the Attempt to Hide its Link to Genetic Engineering” By Jeffrey M. Smith Author of the international bestseller Seeds of Deception.

In my book Seeds of Deception, I bring out new information about the genetically engineered food supplement L-tryptophan, which was responsible for a deadly epidemic in the United States in the 1980s.

Much of the research for the chapter came from the work of investigator William Crist. The book cited Crist¹s report, which was expected to have been posted on a website well in advance of my book¹s publication. Unfortunately,

Crist was unable to update his report at that time. It is now available at www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/
index.cfm and provides important new evidence, including ways in which the U.S. government apparently hid information in order to protect the biotech industry.

In October, 1989, 44-year old Kathy Lorio arrived in the medical office of Dr. Phil Hertzman in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Lorio, who had been healthy and active, was suddenly struck with severe pain and a host of debilitating symptoms.

Blood tests revealed that her eosinophil count had skyrocketed. The normal concentration of this white blood cell is about 10 per CC. Allergies or asthma can make it rise to 500. Lorio¹s was over 10,000.

In a coincidence that was destined to save lives, Hertzman referred her to Santa Fe rheumatologist James Mayer, who happened to have recently seen another patient, Bonnie Bishop, with similar symptoms.

Bishop was in severe pain, her arms and legs were filled with fluid, she had trouble breathing, and her muscles were so weak she couldn¹t even sit up. ³She slumped like a rag doll.²[1] And her eosinophil count was extremely high.

Patient histories revealed that both Bishop and Lorio were taking the food supplement L-tryptophan. Although it was the only supplement common to both patients, the doctors were hesitant to blame L-tryptophan for the disease. It is an essential amino acid, naturally found in turkey and milk, and in supplement form had been consumed safely for years as a treatment for stress, insomnia and depression.

Hertzman checked the literature on eosinophils. One author¹s name kept coming up call. Gleich told him that two cases weren¹t enough to draw a conclusion about L-tryptophan. Better wait. They didn¹t wait long.

That same day a third case, also linked to L-tryptophan, was reported in New Mexico. Gleich called the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta and told them about the cluster of patients in New Mexico and the possible link to L-tryptophan.

Within two weeks, three other patients checked into the Mayo Clinic with serious symptoms taken L-tryptophan and they were from different parts of the country.
Gleich called the CDC again. He told them it¹s not limited to New Mexico nationwide.

Articles began circulating about the mysterious disease. The Albuquerque Journal ran a series about it that eventually won the Pulitzer Prize. The New York Times covered it. As more articles appeared, the phone calls started coming in hundreds, then thousands: individuals with incurable symptoms, doctors with incurable patients, and stories of horrific symptoms.

Some had coughs, rashes, physical weakness, pneumonia, breathing difficulties, hardening of the skin, mouth ulcers, nausea, shortness of breath, muscle spasms, visual problems, hair loss, difficulty with concentration or memory, and paralysis. Not everyone had all the symptoms, but everyone seemed to be in pain had seen before.

The disease was named eosinophilia myalgia syndrome, or EMS the muscle pain. In all, about 5,000 - 10,000 people got sick; some are permanently disabled. About 100 people died.

Disease Traced to Genetic Modification
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported on July 11, 1990 that people only got EMS from pills made by Showa Denko!!!!!!!!!!!!!, one of the six manufacturers whose L-tryptophan was imported into the U.S. from Japan. Showa Denko¹s pills had several unique contaminants that were likely to be responsible for the epidemic.

Moreover, the manufacturer was genetically engineering bacteria to produce the L-tryptophan more economically. Genes had been inserted into bacteria¹ s DNA in order to produce high concentrations of several enzymes used in its production.

Epidemiologist Michael Osterholm, who helped track the source of the epidemic, said in a Newsday article on August 14, ³This obviously leads to that whole debate about genetic engineering.² Two weeks later, FDA spokesperson Sam Page was quoted in Science magazine ³blasting² Osterholm for raising the issue of genetic engineering, ³especially given the impact on the industry.²[2] Diverting Blame There are numerous ways in which genetically engineered bacteria might lead to unpredicted contaminants. For example:

The process of inserting genes can create significant changes in the expression of natural genes throughout the DNA, causing changes in proteins (including enzymes) and their interactions.

Genetic engineering can cause mutations and deletions in the DNA, altering its natural functioning and changing what is produced.

The bacteria were engineered to produce ingredients in larger concentrations than were normally part of the process to create L-tryptophan.

These higher concentrations might interact in unpredictable ways to create new compounds.
The L-tryptophan is toxic to the bacteria that create it. As a means of self-preservation, the bacteria might have modified the L-tryptophan, itself, or its environment. The press reported that Showa Denko had introduced a GM strain of bacteria at Christmas time in 1988. Soon after, they also reduced the amount of carbon in the filter of the manufacturing process from 20 kilos to 10. This change in the filter was just what the young and vulnerable biotech industry needed to protect its reputation. The alternative story diverted the blame away from genetic engineering. This explanation circulated around the world.

The change in the filter was responsible for the epidemic.² Or more simply put, ³It was bad manufacturing In 1996, writer William Crist began what would become an eight-year investigation into the cause of the EMS epidemic. He contacted the FDA¹s biotechnology coordinator, James Maryanski, who told him ³We can not rule [genetic engineering] out. . . . However, we are aware of close to two dozen cases of L-tryptophan-linked EMS that occurred before Showa Denko began using their engineered strain.

So, there would have to be a cause other than just the mere engineering of the strains. Now, I can¹t say that definitively because we don¹t have a lot of information on these earlier cases.² Maryanski asserted that ³either L-tryptophan itself, or L-tryptophan in combination with something that was the result of the purification process, was probably the more likely cause.

Crist decided to track down the EMS cases that Maryanski described altered bacterium was introduced in December 1988. He quickly discovered CDC studies that identified about 100 pre-epidemic cases, not two dozen. And since reported cases of EMS were far less than actual cases, the true number, using the CDC¹s estimated ratio for unreported incidents, was in the hundreds individuals who had ingested Showa Denko¹s pills manufactured before December 1988.

This fact clearly dismantled the change-in-the-filter theory as the cause of the disease. But it didn¹t explain how the contaminants got into Showa Denko¹s L-tryptophan.

Crist spoke with several attorneys who represented EMS victims. They had gathered significant evidence for their lawsuits, which were eventually settled with Showa Denko for about $2 billion. In one company memo obtained by an attorney, Crist discovered a significant fact. The bacterium introduced in December 1988 was called Strain 5.

The preceding three strains, introduced starting on October 22, 1984, were all genetically modified. This was a revelation. It countered the FDA¹s argument that illnesses ³that occurred before Showa Denko began using their engineered strain² meant that ³there would have to be a cause other than [genetic engineering].² But they were all engineered!

As he looked at the memo, Crist wondered why the FDA didn¹t know about the earlier GM strains. They had access to a lot more information he did. Then his eyes rose to the top of the document to see a fax imprint: ³FDA September 17, 1990.² It had been faxed by the FDA! They knew back in 1990 that the earlier strains were modified, but in 1996, the FDA¹s biotech coordinator James Maryanski was still claiming
ignorance.

An even greater omission occurred when Douglas Archer, deputy director of the FDA¹s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, testified before Congress in July 1991 about the epidemic. Not only did he not discuss the earlier bacterial strains, he never even mentioned genetic engineering. Instead, he blamed the disease on ³the dangers inherent in the various health fraud schemes that are being perpetrated upon segments of the American public.² The FDA used this logic to take all L-tryptophan, GM or not, off the market.

According to a 2000 article in the Rutgers Law Journal, ³Political pressures have played a role in the FDA¹s decision to ban L-tryptophan as well as its desire to increase its regulatory power over dietary supplements.²[4] In its FDA Dietary Supplement Task Force report on June 15, 1993, it states, ³The Task Force considered various issues in its deliberations, including … what steps are necessary to ensure that the existence of dietary supplements on the market does not act as a disincentive to drug development.²
According the Rutgersarticle,

This is a particularly disturbing issue,² as it shows that developing FDA guidelines ³has far more to do with eliminating competition in the pharmaceutical industry than preserving the public health.² In the case of L-tryptophan, the FDA simultaneously protected prescription drugs for stress, insomnia and depression, as well as the entire biotech industry. In retrospect, when FDA¹s Sam Page told Science that it was better not to discuss genetic engineering, ³especially given the impact on the industry,² it turns out he was describing the motivation and strategy that would guide the agency for years.

Sobering Lessons Unheeded
Many studies have verified that the process of genetic engineering can produce unpredicted toxins or allergens. Nevertheless, the FDA does not require any additional safety testing for GM products, whether they are food crops or supplements.

Thus, if that same deadly L-tryptophan were first introduced today, it would get on the market.
The EMS epidemic took years to identify and was almost missed. The only reason it was discovered was because the disease had three concurrent characteristics: it was rare, acute, and came on quickly.

What would happen if all three characteristics had not been in place?

What if it took 20 years for onset or only impacted the next generation? What if it produced only mild symptoms like frequent colds? What if it created serious diseases that were common, like cancer, heart-disease, obesity or diabetes? The epidemic might remain undiscovered for decades.

What then of the thousands of products currently being fed to US citizens that contain ingredients from genetic modification? Might they be creating problems that don¹t have all three characteristics?

Are they contributing to the doubling of food-related illnesses in the United States between 1994 and 2001, corresponding to the time when many of these products were introduced? We don¹t know, because no one is looking. And even if we were, derivatives from the four major GM crops, soy, corn, cottonseed, and canola, are found in the majority of processed foods.

Unlike L-tryptophan, if common food ingredients were creating health problems, identifying the source might be impossible.

In spite of these facts, and ignoring the thousands of victims of GM L-tryptophan, U.S. regulators continue to make the baseless statement that ³millions of people have been eating genetically engineered products for years and no one has gotten hurt.² Dissatisfied with the way that the FDA is protecting their health, more and more people have chosen to protect themselves by avoiding GM foods altogether.

Here too, the FDA stands in the way. More than 90 percent of Americans want GM foods labeled. Most industrialized nations require labeling. But the FDA has an official mandate to promote biotechnology. They know that more than half of those surveyed say they would avoid GM foods if they were labeled. To protect industry profits, the FDA ignores the desires of nine out of ten Americans.

There is no indication that another EMS epidemic will emerge from another GM food or supplement. But with obesity, diabetes, migraines, allergies, and many other ailments skyrocketing in the U.S., there is no guarantee that another GM-related epidemic is not already upon us.
To learn more about the potential dangers of GM foods, to find out how to shop GM-free, and to read the excellent report by William Crist, visit

www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/
index.cfm.

Tilføj kommentar 11. august 2009

Eva Kjer Hansen går i spidsen for GMO dyrefoder i Danmark.

Nu er GMO på programmet igen, igen – Og desværre er de videnskabsmænd der burde være uafhængige i forhold til deres rådgivning af vores ministre – Ansat af, eller har tætte bånd til GMO Industrien – Selv dem der tror de læser rapporter om GMO – Læser oftest kun alle de rapporter Monsanto selv har doktoreret, så GMO kun beskrives ud fra ønsketænkning og så positivt som overhovedet muligt. Det er da også ren GMO MONSANTO propaganda Eva Kjer Hansen fører sig frem med.

Rådgivningen omkring GMO, både i USA, EU og i de enkelte EU lande, er ensidig! Og derfor har man i de lande der har været invaderet af GMO længe – Været nødsaget til at skabet anti GMO organisationer der vedvarende og konstant informerer om farerne ved GMO fra de videnskabsmænd der har testet GMO og samlet på resultater af forsøg med GMO både i laboratorier og de uanstændige forsøg GMO industrien (MONSANTO SYNGENTA) har foretaget sig direkte på markerne hos ulykkelige landmænd i Asien. Der mistede både deres høst, deres formuer og deres hele overlevelses mulighed på eksperimenter med GMO.

Her og ikke mindst i EU, har vi de små GMO gesanter som Dan Jørgensen, der med materiale fra Monsantos lobbyister, sikrede flertallet for GMO i EU mod regeringens vilje, og nu går S fødevareordfører ud og aggiterer for mere GMO i Danmark og EU, i hælene på Mette Frederiksens meget bedre bud på Danmark som Økologisk område.
Det virker imidlertid som om Mette Frederiksen er tromlet ned af den socialdemokratiske gruppe eller at hun er gået på sommerferie, for uden at have læst de mange advarsler og dårlige erfaringer med GMO planter i andre dele af verden og sikkert ikke mindst indoktrineret efter noder af GMO industriens lobbyister i EU - Lægger Eva Kjer Hansen, sammen med Venstre, Konservative og Socialdemokraterne op til at åbne for GMO dyrefoder i Danmark.
Dansk Folkeparti advarer: ”Eva Kjer Hansen spiller hazard med befolkningens sundhed, og naturens ve og vel hvis man pludselig tillader en masse unaturlige ting”.

http://www.180grader.dk/nyheder/Folketinget_parat_til_at_bne_for_genmodificeret_dyrefoder.php
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2×5ftpGK1UI

Eva Kjer Hansen har åbenbart ikke gidet læse bøger eller uvildigt materiale om GMO der beskriver alle de farer man allerede har oplevet efter mere end 10 år med GMO og i tusindvis af advarsler fra videnskabsmænd og landmænd – Hun har har ladet sig overtale sammen med den GMO positive gruppe i kommissionen, der i værste fald har ladet sig bestikke til at lukke op for GMO i Europa, og igen med den løgnagtige forklaring man altid bruger, nemlig at der er fødevaremangel i Afrika eller andre dele af verden. Selvom netop Asien har været vidne til de værste GMO katastrofer, så er et folketingsflertal bestående af V, K og S altså parat til at åbne for GMO dyrefoder. Vores folkevalgte slår til igen, igen – Mod sund fornuft og den viden der er tilgængelig i forhold til GMO’s forbandelser.
Men se nu her: (Og det foregår på engelsk/dansk)

Buffaloes in India that ate GMed cottonseed had complications such as premature deliveries, abortions, infertility, and prolapsed uterus. Milk production and performance of lactating showed significant differences between cows fed GM and non-GM feeds. Many calves died.
On January 3rd 2008, 13 buffaloes who grazed GMed cottonseed plants fell sick the next day; all died within 3 days. Buffalo that graze on matured non-GMed cotton plants for past eight years do not suffer from such complications.

Sheep fed GMed cotton plants (in India too) were dead within 30 days; those that grazed on natural cotton plants remained healthy. Post mortem of sheeps that grazed on GM cotton plants, showed severe irritation and black patches in both intestines and liver (as well as enlarged bile ducts).

GMed cottonseed plants also killed 30% of pollinating bees in the fields of Thailand. - Institute for Science in Society, London.

GMed soy (soya beans) has up to seven times more trypsin inhibitor (non-GMed unfermented soy also has this inhibitor too but in lesser amounts). Not long after GMed soy was introduced into the UK, soy allergies skyrocketed by as much as 50%. – Soyabønner = Tofu, formula til babier, soyamælk og soyabønner indår også i alle mulige andre kombinationer i din mad. Det må være rigtig rart at vide når man læser nedenstående.

When GMed soy was fed to female rats, most of their babies died within three weeks; those that survived were also found to be sterile or had difficulty getting pregnant. Only 1 in 10 babies born to rats fed with non-GMed soy died; those who survived and fed with non-GM soy were also bigger in size. (Elevated levels of estrogen due to ingestion of GMed soy, are also known to be damaging to health of animals and human beings.) (Det har jeg tidligere skrevet en artikel om på MAYDAY, men den finds desværre ikke mere på MAYDAY’s hjemmesider.

When male rats were fed GMed soy (aka Terminator Crops), their testicles appeared dark blue instead of the normal pink. (The genetically-modified soy made in this case, was not created with the intention to discolour any organs.) These rats also did not show any significant weight gain.

Mice fed GMed soy had young but deformed sperm cells and altered DNA, leading to infertility.

In an Austrian government study, mice fed GM corn had fewer and smaller babies, when compared to those fed non-GMed corn. Professor Bob Orskov, director of the International Feed Resource Unit (Aberdeen, Scotland), said he would not drink milk from cows fed the genetically modified (GM) fodder maize, known as Chardon LL. (A 1998 Swiss study showed that GMed corn also produced toxic effects in insects that are beneficial to the ecological system.)

In 2001, taco shells and other corn products in the USA were recalled because they were found to contain GMed corn (Starlink). GMed corn causes anaphylaxis. In the UK, anaphylactic shock has increased by 560% since the introduction of GMed foods from the USA. France reported a 5 fold increase.

In 2002, Syngenta (British-Swiss biotech giant that consists of British drug giant AstraZenca and the Swiss drug giant Novartis) paid farmer Gottfried Gloeckner 40,000 Euros in compensation. Gottfried’s cows died after eating Syngenta’s GMed corn.

“Scientists investigating a spate of illnesses among people living close to fields of GMed corn crop in the Philippines believe that the crop may have triggered fevers, respiratory illnesses and skin reactions.” - The Guardian, February 28th 2004

GMed corn has been banned in Germany since Feb 2000. The EU had decided to ban GMed soya beans and Canola (from Canada) and instead opened doors to no GMO food products from Brazil. GMed corn that were initially planned for human consumption was scrapped but ended up as animal feed!!

In the USA, about 24 farmers reported thousands of pigs became infertile/sterile after consuming certain GMed corn varieties. The same happened to cows and bulls who ate those GMed corn. Some had false pregnancies; others gave birth to bags of water! - “Hog Breeding Problems” by Jim Riddle

GMed Rice were said to have an increase in protein by as much as 20%. But the increased protein content was probably due to a decrease in moisture rather than true increase in protein; this puts a question mark over the significance of GMed Rice.

Dr. Pusztai’s experiments with GMed potatoes showed immune system damage in rats that ate them for more than 100 days. (A separate British study revealed that GMed potatoes are 20% lower in proteins, sugar and enzymes.) A similar experiment done on GMed tomatoes had 7 out of forty rats dead within two weeks.

http://www.bloggersbase.com/articles/lifestyle/sports-and-fitness/are-you-eating-foods-of-deception-part-3/
A study published in the journal Archives of Environmental Contamination and Technology showed rats fed for 90 days on Monsanto’s MON863 maize showed “signs of toxicity” in the liver and kidneys. “It is the first time that independent research, published in a peer-reviewed journal, has proved that a GM food presents signs of toxicity,”
Despite biotech’s claims of safety, farmers using GM feed report thousands of sick, sterile and dead livestock. Studies of GM-fed animal reveal lower birth weights and higher infant death rates, organ damage, reproductive failures, infertility, damaged immune systems and abnormal digestive cell growth. United Kingdom soy allergies increased 50 percent soon after GM soy was introduced.

Filipino villagers living near cornfields became seriously ill during pollination. Some animals died after eating the corn. In India, many sheep and oxen died after grazing on GM cotton plants. Thousands of now-impoverished Indian cotton farmers have committed suicide. A German farmer reported some of his cows died after eating GM corn, and others report that dairy cows injected with GM bovine growth hormone have more illnesses and die sooner than non-GM counterparts.

Rats refusing to eat GM tomatoes were force-fed; some developed stomach lesions or died within two weeks, yet the tomatoes were approved for market, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In 1995 highly respected gene researcher Arpad Pusztai found that lab rats’ offspring had weakened immune systems and smaller livers, hearts and brains. He felt it “very unfair to use our fellow citizens as guinea pigs. Pusztai was fired and his research confiscated and discredited, although his findings were later published in The Lancet, an international journal of medical science and practice.

Another study revealed “the same type of unusual cell growth that Pusztai had discovered in the intestine of the rats” eating GM potatoes. “The implications of this cell growth are unclear, but Pusztai and others say it may be a precursor to cancer,” wrote Jeffrey Smith, author of “Seeds of Deception.” “There is irrefutable evidence that GM food is harmful and not evaluated by governments. This is one of the most dangerous technologies ever introduced on earth and deployed in our food supply.” The crops are marketed despite untested and unknown consequences.
Will digestion destroy GM food’s baleful effects? Will antibiotic resistance or pesticide production transfer to humans? The only human study done proved GM soy transgenes survived digestion, jumped the species barrier into human gut bacteria, and continued to function. Other research revealed a GM corn toxin survived digestion in mice, damaging their small intestines.

What happens to humans consuming flesh, milk or eggs from GM-fed animals? It simply isn’t known.
Is genetic modification involved in the alarming increase of children’s head infections caused by drug-resistant staph germs from 2001 to 2006? No one knows. Since GM and non-GM foods look and taste alike and are avowed safe by their developers, the FDA claims they’re “substantially equivalent” and requires no long-term safety studies before market release.

Promises of increased crop yields haven’t materialized, but farmers’ expenses have increased since they’re legally prohibited from saving seeds for the next season.
Meanwhile, the threats escalate. GM contamination cannot be contained; wind, birds, animals and insects all spread GM pollen and seeds. Non-GM fields have become GM; honey can’t be guaranteed GM-free.

The harm to human, animal and planet health is increasing and irreversible.

America’s main GM crops are corn, cotton (cottonseed oil), canola, sugar beets, soy and Hawaiian papaya. If package labeling doesn’t say “non-GM” or “organic” and one of them is listed as an ingredient, it’s probably GM. View DVDs at responsibletechnology.org or seedsofdeception.com. Most important, insist upon GM labeling.”
http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20090406/OPINION07/904060311/1004/OPINION

At Fødevareministeren, Eva Kjer Hansen, nu også vil have at Danmark og EU genovervejer modstanden mod GMO foder – Med henvisning til at GMO er fuldkommen uskadeligt, selvom rapporter fra hele verden der fortæller om hvor skadeligt eller hvor ødelæggende GMO har været både i forhold til de dyr man har skabt og de skader det har påført miljøet.

Svamp i de Canadiske skove som en konsekvens af Round Up, GMO Laks der har udryddet den naturlige laks, monsterdyr, forurende økologiske afgrøder, ødelagt landbrugsjord, superukrudt og besynderlige sygdomme der er svære eller umulige at diagnosticere.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94d-KVorSHM&feature=related

Mængden af allergiske sygdomme er eksploderer efter GMO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=710tmYMxsyY&feature=related

Så grotesk misinformerede er vores egne ministre og EU ordførere nemlig - Fordi de aldrig har søgt viden på webben, hvor der ligger i tusindvis af vidneudsagn om de farlige konsekvenser af GMO og den økonomiske ruin der øjeblikkeligt eller på længere sigt - Rammer de lande der har ladet sig overtale af MONSANTO til at dyrke GMO afgrøder.
De mange bøger der også er skrevet om farerne ved GMO og Endocrinologernes advarsler mod stadig flere og besynderlige autoimmune sygdomme, fedme epidemier, en eksplosion i diabetes 2 hos børn og unge, netop på grund af de mange ukendte epidogener der er i GMO afgrøder.

1/3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joweZ6uM5iY&feature=related

Monsanto superproduceren af Genetisk Mad, har infilteret både USA´s fødevarestyrelse og EU og sørget for at alle de usikre følger af, eller direkte farer ved GMO mad ikke bliver undersøgt. Man bestikker og indsætter MONSANTO folk i både det Amerikanske sundheds og fødevarekommission og Lobbyister forfører EU kommissærer og parlamentsmedlemmer til at stemme Ja til GMO.

2/3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHobGDHtq4E&feature=related

Monsanto skjuler at GMO soya proteinerne ikke kan nedbrudes.
Japansk Professor fortæller om vægtforøgelse hos forsøgsdyr på GMO soya og at GMO øger chancen for multiallergiske reaktioner – GMO Soya er en væsentlig ingrediens i chokolade, og andet slik samt almindelige fødevare produkter og ikke mindst i TOFU, mælkeerstatningsprodukter, og baby mad.
Spørgsmålet er om man forgifter sin baby gennem sutteflasken og om man ikke bør tænke sig meget godt om, før man erstatter hjemmelavet mos af økologiske grøntsager eller økologisk mælk med GMO inficeret baby mad.

3/3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SBH88lvlos&feature=related

Renata Künas fortæller at GMO I EU er en skandale og at EU lader sig presse til at godtage GMO af GMO-Industrien.
Desuden fortæller denne tredje del af GMO konspirations serien om hvordan GMO afgrøder både dræber Køer, Harer og andre dyr, mens der mod alle forventninger er brug for flere og flere Round Up mængder og at man bliver afhængig af GMO fordi Round Up har forgiftet jordene, hvor intet andet end GMO afgrøder kan overleve, og så de superweeds man nu er nødsaget til at sprøjte med giftstoffer der ellers er forbudt.

Andre landmænd, klager over at deres økologiske marker er ødelagte af disse superweeds der flyver og forurener deres økologiske landbrug – Hvorefter de endog kan sagsøges af Monsanto for at dyrke de afgrøder deres jorder er blevet forurenet med.

Desuden viser denne sidste del at både jorde, dyr og mennesker dør eller bliver syge af GMO afgrøderne og den voldsomme besprøjtning med Roundup, som danske haveejere snart har udryddeet alle sommerfugle og desværre også pindsvin med, så vi rigtig kan få gang i dræbersnegleplagen.

Det er de katastrofer der allerede har ramt Brasilien og Australien!
Skal vi også indføre, sygdomsfremkallende GMO afgrøder, med lukkede øjne og på anbefaling af ministre der er forført af GMO industrien?

Det tager du kun stilling til ved at sætte dig ind i problematikken! Du kan ikke regne med at ministrene her eller i EU baserer deres viden på sund fornuft eller bruger deres kritiske øje i forhold til GMO.

Jeg læste allerede de skræmmende beretninger om GMO pollution for 10 år siden - Jeg havde hørt om Monarksommerfuglen der ikke kunne overleve Roundup og jeg så hvordan alle sommerfuglene forsvandt i min egen have, efter Gentofte Kommune sprøjtede hele Gentofte Kommunes veje og brosten med Roundup - Derfor finder jeg det fuldkommen grotesk at de ministre der skal rådgive os om hvad vi bør gøre – Lader sig forføre af MONSANTO, uden at lade sig vejlede af førende videnskabsmænd – tusindvis af websider og advarsler og bøger der dokumenterer hvor ødelæggende GMO vil være for vores landbrug. Ikke mindst den skræmmende historie om at de bisværme man lejer ud til frugtplantagerne i USA nu rammes af forgiftninger af de nye pesticider og forsvinder Grand Scale, som en konsekvens af GMO og det øgede behov for stadig stærkere gifte, nu hvor flere og flere planter er blevet resistente over for GMO.

Hvis alle bierne og forstøverne forsvinder, hvad gør vi så?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/100407beesdying.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9SywTI3jsI&feature=related

Man ser også den svinske misinformation fra Monsanto, der undlader at fortælle at det de lover fremmer mælkeproduktionen, gør køerne syge, fremmer yverbetændelse og fremmer behovet for pennicelling der i sidste ende rammer forbrugeren gennem mælken og de burgere der afslutter fødekæden af hormonforgiftede køer hos forbrugeren:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwkwhJuZtbw&feature=related

Samtidig kan man så også spørge sig selv om vi allerede forgifter os selv, gennem at spise Hellmanns Mayonaise, og andre USA importerede fødevarer som Kellogs Cornflakes og andre sukkerforgiftende morgenmadsprodukter, TOFU, og Mælkeerstatinger og Baby Mad, som man ikke behøver at deklarere som indeholdende GMO, fordi det kun er en ingrediens – Og det er det også selvom GMO ingrediensen er hovedingrediensen?

Vi kan også spørge os selv om fedmeepidemien, diabetes, fibromyalgi og andre nye og svært diagnosticerbare autoimmune sygdomme - Også er en konsekvens af de allergener man påstår fremmer multiallergiske reaktioner i både USA og EU? Det er under alle omstændigheder hvad flere fremstående endocrinologer peger på.
AT den tredje verden absolut ikke har brug for Monsanto - Det kan man ser her.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av6dx9yNiCA&feature=related

Tilføj kommentar 22. juni 2009